TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardioverter-defibrillator reduces mortality risk in eligible ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients
T2 - Sub-analysis of the multi-center Improve SCA study
AU - Singh, Balbir
AU - Hsieh, Yu Cheng
AU - Liu, Yen Bin
AU - Lin, Kuo Hung
AU - Joung, Boyoung
AU - Rodriguez, Diego A.
AU - Chasnoits, Alexandr R.
AU - Huang, Dejia
AU - Zhang, Shu
AU - O'Brien, Janet E.
AU - Lexcen, Daniel R.
AU - Cerkvenik, Jeffrey
AU - Van Dorn, Brian
AU - Ching, Chi Keong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - Background & Objective: Despite the burden of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) worldwide, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are underutilized, particularly in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The Improve SCA trial demonstrated that primary prevention (PP) patients in these regions benefit from an ICD or a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). We aimed to compare the rate of device therapy and mortality among ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM and NICM) PP patients who met guideline indications for ICD therapy and had an ICD/CRT-D implanted. Methods: Improve SCA was a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded multicenter trial that enrolled patients from the above-mentioned regions. All-cause mortality and device therapy were examined by cardiomyopathy (ICM vs NICM) and implantation status. Cox proportional hazards methods were used, adjusting for factors affecting mortality risk. Results: Of 1848 PP NICM patients, 1007 (54.5%) received ICD/CRT-D, while 303 of 581 (52.1%) PP ICM patients received an ICD/CRT-D. The all-cause mortality rate at 3 years for NICM patients with and without an ICD/CRT-D was 13.1% and 18.3%, respectively (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38–0.68, p < 0.001). Similarly, all-cause mortality at 3 years in ICM patients was 13.8% in those with a device and 19.9% in those without an ICD/CRT-D (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33–.0.88, p = 0.011). The time to first device therapy, time to first shock, and time to first antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy were not significantly different between groups (p ≥ 0.263). Conclusions: In this large data set of patients with a guideline-based PP ICD indication, defibrillator device implantation conferred a significant mortality benefit in both NICM and ICM patients. The rate of appropriate device therapy was also similar in both groups. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02099721.
AB - Background & Objective: Despite the burden of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) worldwide, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are underutilized, particularly in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The Improve SCA trial demonstrated that primary prevention (PP) patients in these regions benefit from an ICD or a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). We aimed to compare the rate of device therapy and mortality among ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM and NICM) PP patients who met guideline indications for ICD therapy and had an ICD/CRT-D implanted. Methods: Improve SCA was a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded multicenter trial that enrolled patients from the above-mentioned regions. All-cause mortality and device therapy were examined by cardiomyopathy (ICM vs NICM) and implantation status. Cox proportional hazards methods were used, adjusting for factors affecting mortality risk. Results: Of 1848 PP NICM patients, 1007 (54.5%) received ICD/CRT-D, while 303 of 581 (52.1%) PP ICM patients received an ICD/CRT-D. The all-cause mortality rate at 3 years for NICM patients with and without an ICD/CRT-D was 13.1% and 18.3%, respectively (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38–0.68, p < 0.001). Similarly, all-cause mortality at 3 years in ICM patients was 13.8% in those with a device and 19.9% in those without an ICD/CRT-D (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33–.0.88, p = 0.011). The time to first device therapy, time to first shock, and time to first antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy were not significantly different between groups (p ≥ 0.263). Conclusions: In this large data set of patients with a guideline-based PP ICD indication, defibrillator device implantation conferred a significant mortality benefit in both NICM and ICM patients. The rate of appropriate device therapy was also similar in both groups. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02099721.
KW - Heart failure
KW - Implantable cardioverter defibrillators
KW - Sudden cardiac arrest
KW - Sudden cardiac death
KW - Ventricular arrhythmias
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148365655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85148365655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.01.010
DO - 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.01.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 36736459
AN - SCOPUS:85148365655
SN - 0019-4832
VL - 75
SP - 115
EP - 121
JO - Indian Heart Journal
JF - Indian Heart Journal
IS - 2
ER -