Balanced scorecard based performance analysis of accreditation for engineering education

Yonghan Ju, So Young Sohn, Jinsook Ahn, Jin Young Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


The number of students graduating from accredited programs has been increasing annually since the first students graduated from accredited engineering programs in Korean universities in 2004. In this paper, we evaluate the effect of engineering education accreditation by the Accreditation Board for Engineering Education of Korea (ABEEK). We developed performance evaluation indices based on the balanced scorecard concept and applied the proposed indica-tors to graduates, faculty, and industry employers to see if there are significant differences between accredited and non-accredited groups. Overall, regardless of survey object, engineering education accreditation was perceived to con-tribute to the elevation of engineering and science and the level of national growth. However, the differences between accredited and non-accredited groups for some key performance indicators were statistically insignificant. The results of this paper are expected to provide crucial feedback information for the improvement of engineering education ac-creditation in Korea.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-86
Number of pages20
JournalIndustrial Engineering and Management Systems
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Mar 1

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 KIIE.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Balanced scorecard based performance analysis of accreditation for engineering education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this