TY - JOUR
T1 - Asymptotic local power of pooled t-ratio tests for unit roots in panels with fixed effects
AU - Moon, Hyungsik Roger
AU - Perron, Benoit
PY - 2008/2
Y1 - 2008/2
N2 - We derive analytically the local asymptotic power of two pooled t-ratio tests for the presence of a unit root in a panel with fixed effects. We consider two statistics which differ according to the method used to remove the bias of the pooled OLS estimator. We show that when we bias-correct the numerator only, the resulting test has significant local power in n-1/4 T-1 neighbourhoods of the null of a panel unit root, while when the entire estimator is corrected for bias, the resulting statistic has local asymptotic power in neighbourhoods shrinking at the faster rate of n-1/2 T-1. This latter test is equivalent to the well-known pooled t test proposed by Levin et al. (2002, Journal of Econometrics 108, 1-24), and its power depends only on the mean of the local-to-unity parameters. This implies that it has the same power against homogeneous and heterogeneous alternatives with the same mean autoregressive parameter. We then compare these tests to a panel version of the Sargan-Bhargava (1983, Econometrica 51, 153-74) statistic for a unit root and the common point-optimal test of Moon et al. (2007, Journal of Econometrics 141, 416-51). Monte Carlo simulations confirm the usefulness of our local-to-unity framework.
AB - We derive analytically the local asymptotic power of two pooled t-ratio tests for the presence of a unit root in a panel with fixed effects. We consider two statistics which differ according to the method used to remove the bias of the pooled OLS estimator. We show that when we bias-correct the numerator only, the resulting test has significant local power in n-1/4 T-1 neighbourhoods of the null of a panel unit root, while when the entire estimator is corrected for bias, the resulting statistic has local asymptotic power in neighbourhoods shrinking at the faster rate of n-1/2 T-1. This latter test is equivalent to the well-known pooled t test proposed by Levin et al. (2002, Journal of Econometrics 108, 1-24), and its power depends only on the mean of the local-to-unity parameters. This implies that it has the same power against homogeneous and heterogeneous alternatives with the same mean autoregressive parameter. We then compare these tests to a panel version of the Sargan-Bhargava (1983, Econometrica 51, 153-74) statistic for a unit root and the common point-optimal test of Moon et al. (2007, Journal of Econometrics 141, 416-51). Monte Carlo simulations confirm the usefulness of our local-to-unity framework.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40149098546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40149098546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2008.00236.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2008.00236.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:40149098546
SN - 1368-4221
VL - 11
SP - 80
EP - 104
JO - Econometrics Journal
JF - Econometrics Journal
IS - 1
ER -