TY - JOUR
T1 - Asymmetric barriers in atmospheric politics of transboundary air pollution
T2 - a case of particulate matter (PM) cooperation between China and South Korea
AU - Lee, Taedong
AU - Paik, Wooyeal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Existing studies have argued that regional cooperation is urgent in order to tackle transboundary air pollution. However, few studies have operationalized atmospheric cooperation steps and theorized the underlying logic of asymmetry as a barrier to further cooperation. Given that air quality degradation and its impact on neighboring countries have worsened around the world, it is imperative to identify a framework with which to analyze the degree of transboundary cooperation. This study aims to provide a general explanation of barriers to transboundary air pollution cooperation and test the explanation empirically through a case study of China and South Korea. Our findings suggest that asymmetric barriers—in state capacity, economic interests, domestic pressures, and international pressure—impede the process of cooperation in atmospheric politics. This systematic analysis points to policy suggestions including the improvement of regional epistemic community, economic co-benefits, and multilateral institution that enhance the chances of reducing transboundary air pollution.
AB - Existing studies have argued that regional cooperation is urgent in order to tackle transboundary air pollution. However, few studies have operationalized atmospheric cooperation steps and theorized the underlying logic of asymmetry as a barrier to further cooperation. Given that air quality degradation and its impact on neighboring countries have worsened around the world, it is imperative to identify a framework with which to analyze the degree of transboundary cooperation. This study aims to provide a general explanation of barriers to transboundary air pollution cooperation and test the explanation empirically through a case study of China and South Korea. Our findings suggest that asymmetric barriers—in state capacity, economic interests, domestic pressures, and international pressure—impede the process of cooperation in atmospheric politics. This systematic analysis points to policy suggestions including the improvement of regional epistemic community, economic co-benefits, and multilateral institution that enhance the chances of reducing transboundary air pollution.
KW - Asymmetry
KW - Atmospheric politics
KW - China and South Korea relations
KW - Interactions between domestic politics and international politics
KW - Transboundary air pollution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077590795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077590795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10784-019-09463-6
DO - 10.1007/s10784-019-09463-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077590795
SN - 1567-9764
VL - 20
SP - 123
EP - 140
JO - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
JF - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
IS - 1
ER -