TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of participant satisfaction with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in South Korea
AU - Lee, Hoo Yeon
AU - Lim, Sun Mi
AU - Han, Mi Ah
AU - Jun, Jae Kwan
AU - Choi, Kui Son
AU - Hahm, Myung Il
AU - Park, Eun Cheol
PY - 2011/9/28
Y1 - 2011/9/28
N2 - AIM: To measure the perceived satisfaction with gastric cancer screening as part of the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) in South Korea. METHODS: Data were derived from the participants in a satisfaction survey of the Quality Evaluation of National Cancer Screening in 2009. This is a populationbased nationwide telephone survey of participants who were screened by the NCSP between May and October 2009. This study included 4412 participants who provided full sets of data and who had upper endoscopies for the purpose of gastric cancer screening. RESULTS: The negative appraisal percentages for each of the seven questions were as follows: explanation in preparation for the upper endoscopy, 12.3%; explanation about the process and procedure of the upper endoscopy, 13.8%; explanation about any pain or discomfort related to the upper endoscopy, 27.5%; level of pain during the procedure, 30.3%; physical environment, 16.2%; manner of the staff, 11.2%, and privacy protection, 8.8%. CONCLUSION: The critical issues identified by the Pareto analysis include the adequacy of the explanation about any pain or discomfort associated with the upper endoscopy and the level of pain experienced during the procedure.
AB - AIM: To measure the perceived satisfaction with gastric cancer screening as part of the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) in South Korea. METHODS: Data were derived from the participants in a satisfaction survey of the Quality Evaluation of National Cancer Screening in 2009. This is a populationbased nationwide telephone survey of participants who were screened by the NCSP between May and October 2009. This study included 4412 participants who provided full sets of data and who had upper endoscopies for the purpose of gastric cancer screening. RESULTS: The negative appraisal percentages for each of the seven questions were as follows: explanation in preparation for the upper endoscopy, 12.3%; explanation about the process and procedure of the upper endoscopy, 13.8%; explanation about any pain or discomfort related to the upper endoscopy, 27.5%; level of pain during the procedure, 30.3%; physical environment, 16.2%; manner of the staff, 11.2%, and privacy protection, 8.8%. CONCLUSION: The critical issues identified by the Pareto analysis include the adequacy of the explanation about any pain or discomfort associated with the upper endoscopy and the level of pain experienced during the procedure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80155167126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80155167126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3748/wjg.v17.i36.4124
DO - 10.3748/wjg.v17.i36.4124
M3 - Article
C2 - 22039328
AN - SCOPUS:80155167126
SN - 1007-9327
VL - 17
SP - 4124
EP - 4129
JO - World Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - World Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 36
ER -