TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial Intelligence for the Computer-aided Detection of Periapical Lesions in Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Images
AU - Setzer, Frank C.
AU - Shi, Katherine J.
AU - Zhang, Zhiyang
AU - Yan, Hao
AU - Yoon, Hyunsoo
AU - Mupparapu, Mel
AU - Li, Jing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Association of Endodontists
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Introduction: The aim of this study was to use a Deep Learning (DL) algorithm for the automated segmentation of cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images and the detection of periapical lesions. Methods: Limited field of view CBCT volumes (n = 20) containing 61 roots with and without lesions were segmented clinician dependent versus using the DL approach based on a U-Net architecture. Segmentation labeled each voxel as 1 of 5 categories: “lesion” (periapical lesion), “tooth structure,” “bone,” “restorative materials,” and “background.” Repeated splits of all images into a training set and a validation set based on 5-fold cross validation were performed using Deep Learning segmentation (DLS), and the results were averaged. DLS versus clinical-dependent segmentation was assessed by dichotomized lesion detection accuracy evaluating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and voxel-matching accuracy using the DICE index for each of the 5 labels. Results: DLS lesion detection accuracy was 0.93 with specificity of 0.88, positive predictive value of 0.87, and negative predictive value of 0.93. The overall cumulative DICE indexes for the individual labels were lesion = 0.52, tooth structure = 0.74, bone = 0.78, restorative materials = 0.58, and background = 0.95. The cumulative DICE index for all actual true lesions was 0.67. Conclusions: This DL algorithm trained in a limited CBCT environment showed excellent results in lesion detection accuracy. Overall voxel-matching accuracy may be benefited by enhanced versions of artificial intelligence.
AB - Introduction: The aim of this study was to use a Deep Learning (DL) algorithm for the automated segmentation of cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images and the detection of periapical lesions. Methods: Limited field of view CBCT volumes (n = 20) containing 61 roots with and without lesions were segmented clinician dependent versus using the DL approach based on a U-Net architecture. Segmentation labeled each voxel as 1 of 5 categories: “lesion” (periapical lesion), “tooth structure,” “bone,” “restorative materials,” and “background.” Repeated splits of all images into a training set and a validation set based on 5-fold cross validation were performed using Deep Learning segmentation (DLS), and the results were averaged. DLS versus clinical-dependent segmentation was assessed by dichotomized lesion detection accuracy evaluating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and voxel-matching accuracy using the DICE index for each of the 5 labels. Results: DLS lesion detection accuracy was 0.93 with specificity of 0.88, positive predictive value of 0.87, and negative predictive value of 0.93. The overall cumulative DICE indexes for the individual labels were lesion = 0.52, tooth structure = 0.74, bone = 0.78, restorative materials = 0.58, and background = 0.95. The cumulative DICE index for all actual true lesions was 0.67. Conclusions: This DL algorithm trained in a limited CBCT environment showed excellent results in lesion detection accuracy. Overall voxel-matching accuracy may be benefited by enhanced versions of artificial intelligence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084386436&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084386436&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.025
DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 32402466
AN - SCOPUS:85084386436
SN - 0099-2399
VL - 46
SP - 987
EP - 993
JO - Journal of Endodontics
JF - Journal of Endodontics
IS - 7
ER -