TY - JOUR
T1 - Anaplastic ganglioglioma—A diagnosis comprising several distinct tumour types
AU - Reinhardt, Annekathrin
AU - Pfister, Kristin
AU - Schrimpf, Daniel
AU - Stichel, Damian
AU - Sahm, Felix
AU - Reuss, David E.
AU - Capper, David
AU - Wefers, Annika K.
AU - Ebrahimi, Azadeh
AU - Sill, Martin
AU - Felsberg, Joerg
AU - Reifenberger, Guido
AU - Becker, Albert
AU - Prinz, Marco
AU - Staszewski, Ori
AU - Hartmann, Christian
AU - Schittenhelm, Jens
AU - Gramatzki, Dorothee
AU - Weller, Michael
AU - Olar, Adriana
AU - Rushing, Elisabeth Jane
AU - Bergmann, Markus
AU - Farrell, Michael A.
AU - Blümcke, Ingmar
AU - Coras, Roland
AU - Beckervordersandforth, Jan
AU - Kim, Se Hoon
AU - Rogerio, Fabio
AU - Dimova, Petia S.
AU - Niehusmann, Pitt
AU - Unterberg, Andreas
AU - Platten, Michael
AU - Pfister, Stefan M.
AU - Wick, Wolfgang
AU - Herold-Mende, Christel
AU - von Deimling, Andreas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Neuropathological Society.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Aims: Anaplastic ganglioglioma is a rare tumour, and diagnosis has been based on histological criteria. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System (CNS WHO) does not list anaplastic ganglioglioma as a distinct diagnosis due to lack of molecular data in previous publications. We retrospectively compiled a cohort of 54 histologically diagnosed anaplastic gangliogliomas to explore whether the molecular profiles of these tumours represent a separate type or resolve into other entities. Methods: Samples were subjected to histological review, desoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation profiling and next-generation sequencing. Morphological and molecular data were summarised to an integrated diagnosis. Results: The majority of tumours designated as anaplastic gangliogliomas resolved into other CNS WHO diagnoses, most commonly pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (16/54), glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase protein (IDH) wild type and diffuse paediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3 wild type and IDH wild type (11 and 2/54), followed by low-grade glial or glioneuronal tumours including pilocytic astrocytoma, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour and diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumour (5/54), IDH mutant astrocytoma (4/54) and others (6/54). A subset of tumours (10/54) was not assignable to a CNS WHO diagnosis, and common molecular profiles pointing to a separate entity were not evident. Conclusions: In summary, we show that tumours histologically diagnosed as anaplastic ganglioglioma comprise a wide spectrum of CNS WHO tumour types with different prognostic and therapeutic implications. We therefore suggest assigning this designation with caution and recommend comprehensive molecular workup.
AB - Aims: Anaplastic ganglioglioma is a rare tumour, and diagnosis has been based on histological criteria. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System (CNS WHO) does not list anaplastic ganglioglioma as a distinct diagnosis due to lack of molecular data in previous publications. We retrospectively compiled a cohort of 54 histologically diagnosed anaplastic gangliogliomas to explore whether the molecular profiles of these tumours represent a separate type or resolve into other entities. Methods: Samples were subjected to histological review, desoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation profiling and next-generation sequencing. Morphological and molecular data were summarised to an integrated diagnosis. Results: The majority of tumours designated as anaplastic gangliogliomas resolved into other CNS WHO diagnoses, most commonly pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (16/54), glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase protein (IDH) wild type and diffuse paediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3 wild type and IDH wild type (11 and 2/54), followed by low-grade glial or glioneuronal tumours including pilocytic astrocytoma, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour and diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumour (5/54), IDH mutant astrocytoma (4/54) and others (6/54). A subset of tumours (10/54) was not assignable to a CNS WHO diagnosis, and common molecular profiles pointing to a separate entity were not evident. Conclusions: In summary, we show that tumours histologically diagnosed as anaplastic ganglioglioma comprise a wide spectrum of CNS WHO tumour types with different prognostic and therapeutic implications. We therefore suggest assigning this designation with caution and recommend comprehensive molecular workup.
KW - DNA methylation analysis
KW - anaplastic ganglioglioma
KW - ganglioglioma
KW - methylation class
KW - molecular glioma entities
KW - molecular neuropathology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138046994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138046994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/nan.12847
DO - 10.1111/nan.12847
M3 - Article
C2 - 35977725
AN - SCOPUS:85138046994
SN - 0305-1846
VL - 48
JO - Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
JF - Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
IS - 7
M1 - e12847
ER -