TY - JOUR
T1 - American coalition building of the US-led security network in the Indo-Pacific
T2 - US influence-building measures
AU - Park, Jae Jeok
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Australian Institute of International Affairs.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The US has been constructing a security network in the Indo-Pacific, composed of US-led alliances and security partnerships. This network is less hierarchical than the hub-and-spoke alliance structure that the US maintained during the Cold War. The article suggests that, akin to the ‘connectivity strategy’ introduced in this special issue, the US, which once dominated a hierarchical hub-and-spoke system with unquestioned centrality, is now striving to enhance its centrality within the US-led security network. To achieve this, the US has been working to improve its ‘closeness’, ‘betweenness’, and ‘eigenvalue’ centrality, in addition to degree centrality. Furthermore, the article posits that the US adopts ‘the strategy of association,’ as introduced in this special issue. The US has been at the forefront of regional missile defense, maritime security, and dual-use technology development to foster like-mindedness and build trust among network members, viewing China (and North Korea) as the ‘other’. Lastly, the article conceptualises ‘security mutuality’ by building upon the concept of ‘alliance mutuality’ proposed by William Tow and Amitav Acharya. It asserts that fostering ‘security mutuality’ is essential for sustaining US coalitional hegemony.
AB - The US has been constructing a security network in the Indo-Pacific, composed of US-led alliances and security partnerships. This network is less hierarchical than the hub-and-spoke alliance structure that the US maintained during the Cold War. The article suggests that, akin to the ‘connectivity strategy’ introduced in this special issue, the US, which once dominated a hierarchical hub-and-spoke system with unquestioned centrality, is now striving to enhance its centrality within the US-led security network. To achieve this, the US has been working to improve its ‘closeness’, ‘betweenness’, and ‘eigenvalue’ centrality, in addition to degree centrality. Furthermore, the article posits that the US adopts ‘the strategy of association,’ as introduced in this special issue. The US has been at the forefront of regional missile defense, maritime security, and dual-use technology development to foster like-mindedness and build trust among network members, viewing China (and North Korea) as the ‘other’. Lastly, the article conceptualises ‘security mutuality’ by building upon the concept of ‘alliance mutuality’ proposed by William Tow and Amitav Acharya. It asserts that fostering ‘security mutuality’ is essential for sustaining US coalitional hegemony.
KW - US-led security network
KW - network centrality
KW - security mutuality
KW - the strategy of association
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216788358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85216788358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10357718.2025.2458692
DO - 10.1080/10357718.2025.2458692
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216788358
SN - 1035-7718
JO - Australian Journal of International Affairs
JF - Australian Journal of International Affairs
ER -