TY - JOUR
T1 - Additional magnetic resonance imaging-detected suspicious lesions in known patients with breast cancer
T2 - Comparison of second-look digital tomosynthesis and ultrasonography
AU - Koh, Jieun
AU - Kim, Eun Kyung
AU - Kim, Min Jung
AU - Yoon, Jung Hyun
AU - Moon, Hee Jung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the performances of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasonography (US) for additionalmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected suspicious lesions in patients referred for breast cancer. Methods: Fifty-five patients (52.5[9.3] years) with breast cancers newly diagnosed at a referring hospital underwent MRI and afterward DBT and US in our institution. The frequency for detecting additional MRI-detected suspicious lesions on DBT and US and performances of DBT and US were compared. Results: Of 37 additionalMRI-detected suspicious lesions, 27 were detected on DBT and/or US; 2 were detected on both DBT and US, 1 was detected only on DBT, and 24 were detected only on US. Ultrasonography detected more additional suspicious lesions than DBT (P<0.0001). Twelve (44.4%) of the 27 lesions were malignant. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of US (100.0% and 100.0%) were significantly higher than those of DBT (16.7% and 83.6%, P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). The specificity of DBT was significantly higher (98.1%) than that of US (78.9%, P = 0.002). Positive predictive values of DBT and US were not significantly different (66.7% vs 52.2%, P = 0.598). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of US was significantly higher (0.894) than that of DBT (0.574, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Second-look US showed higher performances than DBT for detecting and characterizing suspicious lesions additionally detected on MRI in patients referred for breast cancer.
AB - Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the performances of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasonography (US) for additionalmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected suspicious lesions in patients referred for breast cancer. Methods: Fifty-five patients (52.5[9.3] years) with breast cancers newly diagnosed at a referring hospital underwent MRI and afterward DBT and US in our institution. The frequency for detecting additional MRI-detected suspicious lesions on DBT and US and performances of DBT and US were compared. Results: Of 37 additionalMRI-detected suspicious lesions, 27 were detected on DBT and/or US; 2 were detected on both DBT and US, 1 was detected only on DBT, and 24 were detected only on US. Ultrasonography detected more additional suspicious lesions than DBT (P<0.0001). Twelve (44.4%) of the 27 lesions were malignant. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of US (100.0% and 100.0%) were significantly higher than those of DBT (16.7% and 83.6%, P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). The specificity of DBT was significantly higher (98.1%) than that of US (78.9%, P = 0.002). Positive predictive values of DBT and US were not significantly different (66.7% vs 52.2%, P = 0.598). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of US was significantly higher (0.894) than that of DBT (0.574, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Second-look US showed higher performances than DBT for detecting and characterizing suspicious lesions additionally detected on MRI in patients referred for breast cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013448340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013448340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000273
DO - 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000273
M3 - Article
C2 - 28221238
AN - SCOPUS:85013448340
SN - 0894-8771
VL - 33
SP - 167
EP - 173
JO - Ultrasound Quarterly
JF - Ultrasound Quarterly
IS - 2
ER -