TY - GEN
T1 - A new analysis method for paired comparison and its application to 3D quality assessment
AU - Lee, Jong Seok
AU - Goldmann, Lutz
AU - Ebrahimi, Touradj
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Among various subjective quality evaluation methodologies, paired comparison has the advantage of improved simplicity of the subjects'evaluation task due to simplified rating scales and direct comparison of two stimuli. Thus, it may lead to more reliable results when individual quality levels are difficult to define, quality differences between stimuli are small or multiple quality factors are involved. This paper proposes a new method to analyze results of paired comparison-based subjective tests. By assuming that ties convey information about significant differences between two stimuli being compared, the confidence intervals for the quality scores are estimated using a maximum likelihood criterion, which enables us to intuitively examine the significance of quality score differences. We describe the complete test methodology including the test procedure, outlier detection and score analysis applied to quality assessment of 3D images acquired using varying camera distances. Experimental results demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed analysis method, as well as the enhanced quality discriminability of the paired comparison methodology in comparison to the conventional single stimulus methodology.
AB - Among various subjective quality evaluation methodologies, paired comparison has the advantage of improved simplicity of the subjects'evaluation task due to simplified rating scales and direct comparison of two stimuli. Thus, it may lead to more reliable results when individual quality levels are difficult to define, quality differences between stimuli are small or multiple quality factors are involved. This paper proposes a new method to analyze results of paired comparison-based subjective tests. By assuming that ties convey information about significant differences between two stimuli being compared, the confidence intervals for the quality scores are estimated using a maximum likelihood criterion, which enables us to intuitively examine the significance of quality score differences. We describe the complete test methodology including the test procedure, outlier detection and score analysis applied to quality assessment of 3D images acquired using varying camera distances. Experimental results demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed analysis method, as well as the enhanced quality discriminability of the paired comparison methodology in comparison to the conventional single stimulus methodology.
KW - Maximum likelihood estimation
KW - Paired comparison
KW - Quality of experience
KW - Statistical significance
KW - Stereoscopic image
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84455205247&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84455205247&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2072298.2071994
DO - 10.1145/2072298.2071994
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84455205247
SN - 9781450306164
T3 - MM'11 - Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Multimedia Conference and Co-Located Workshops
SP - 1281
EP - 1284
BT - MM'11 - Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Multimedia Conference and Co-Located Workshops
T2 - 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia ACM Multimedia 2011, MM'11
Y2 - 28 November 2011 through 1 December 2011
ER -