A cross-comparative analysis of four projects towards sustainable neighbourhood design

Kyung Bae Kim; Jea Sun Lee

doi:10.1057/udi.2013.25

A cross-comparative analysis of four projects towards sustainable neighbourhood design

Kyung Bae Kim, Jea Sun Lee

Department of Urban Planning and Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents a cross-comparative analysis of four projects' progress towards sustainable neighbourhood design. It starts by explaining key strengths and weaknesses of the research methodology adopted. It then explains key features of, and reasons for, selecting the four projects. It subsequently compares the four case studies' relative levels of progress towards sustainability, highlighting key factors contributing to differences in performance. Finally, it points to lessons learnt for promoting future sustainable neighbourhood development.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	291-302
Number of pages	12
Journal	Urban Design International
Volume	19
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.25
Publication status	Published - 2014 Dec 13

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by Inha University and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. 2010–0006673, No. 2012–008212).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Macmillan Publishers Ltd. © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Geography, Planning and Development
Urban Studies

Access to Document

10.1057/udi.2013.25

Cite this

@article{c669e2b362f74e83a4f574c9b0876499,

title = "A cross-comparative analysis of four projects towards sustainable neighbourhood design",

abstract = "This article presents a cross-comparative analysis of four projects' progress towards sustainable neighbourhood design. It starts by explaining key strengths and weaknesses of the research methodology adopted. It then explains key features of, and reasons for, selecting the four projects. It subsequently compares the four case studies' relative levels of progress towards sustainability, highlighting key factors contributing to differences in performance. Finally, it points to lessons learnt for promoting future sustainable neighbourhood development.",

author = "Kim, {Kyung Bae} and Lee, {Jea Sun}",

note = "Funding Information: This research was supported by Inha University and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. 2010–0006673, No. 2012–008212). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014 Macmillan Publishers Ltd. {\textcopyright} 2014 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.",

year = "2014",

month = dec,

day = "13",

doi = "10.1057/udi.2013.25",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "291--302",

journal = "Urban Design International",

issn = "1357-5317",

publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cross-comparative analysis of four projects towards sustainable neighbourhood design

AU - Kim, Kyung Bae

AU - Lee, Jea Sun

N1 - Funding Information: This research was supported by Inha University and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. 2010–0006673, No. 2012–008212). Publisher Copyright: © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Ltd. © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

PY - 2014/12/13

Y1 - 2014/12/13

N2 - This article presents a cross-comparative analysis of four projects' progress towards sustainable neighbourhood design. It starts by explaining key strengths and weaknesses of the research methodology adopted. It then explains key features of, and reasons for, selecting the four projects. It subsequently compares the four case studies' relative levels of progress towards sustainability, highlighting key factors contributing to differences in performance. Finally, it points to lessons learnt for promoting future sustainable neighbourhood development.

AB - This article presents a cross-comparative analysis of four projects' progress towards sustainable neighbourhood design. It starts by explaining key strengths and weaknesses of the research methodology adopted. It then explains key features of, and reasons for, selecting the four projects. It subsequently compares the four case studies' relative levels of progress towards sustainability, highlighting key factors contributing to differences in performance. Finally, it points to lessons learnt for promoting future sustainable neighbourhood development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910083059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84910083059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/udi.2013.25

DO - 10.1057/udi.2013.25

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84910083059

SN - 1357-5317

VL - 19

SP - 291

EP - 302

JO - Urban Design International

JF - Urban Design International

IS - 4

ER -

A cross-comparative analysis of four projects towards sustainable neighbourhood design

Abstract

Bibliographical note

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this