3R phase of MoS2 and WS2 outperforms the corresponding 2H phase for hydrogen evolution

Rou Jun Toh, Zdeněk Sofer, Jan Luxa, David Sedmidubský, Martin Pumera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

145 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Herein, we compare the bulk, 2H and 3R phases of two most prevalent TMD materials: MoS2 and WS2.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3054-3057
Number of pages4
JournalChemical Communications
Volume53
Issue number21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
M. P. acknowledges a Tier 2 grant (MOE2013-T2-1-056). R. J. T. acknowledges SMA3 Singapore-MIT SMART Center. Z. S., D. S. and J. L. were supported by the Czech Science Foundation (GACR No. 16-05167S) and by specific university research (MSMT No. 20-SVV/2017). This work was supported by the project Advanced Functional Nanorobots (reg. No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000444 financed by the EFRR).

Publisher Copyright:
© The Royal Society of Chemistry.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Catalysis
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films
  • Metals and Alloys
  • Materials Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '3R phase of MoS2 and WS2 outperforms the corresponding 2H phase for hydrogen evolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this